terjemahan buku economic development michael p. todaro

Additionally, Todaro often fails to properly argue many of his points, instead 'briefly summarizing' (if 7 pages could ever be considered brief) with lengthy, w The most unnecessarily verbose text on economics I have yet encountered, this book could easily have been reduced to one third or one fourth of its length. The author attempts to explain mathematical concepts without any mathematical terms and often ends up dragging on for several pages without coming to any semblance succinct conclusion. The most unnecessarily verbose text on economics I have yet encountered, this book could easily have been reduced to one third or one fourth of its length. Professors would do well to adopt Justin Lin's 'New Structural Economics' instead, which is about economic development - in contrast to this book.more Theories, empirics and debates are well balanced.

It is an almost encyclopaedic coverage of many issues related to backwardness and poverty. But a development economics textbook has to be about development and hope and this one is not.Īnyway, as I mentioned earlier, the book is really well-written. I'm not saying that we should close our eyes from the misery of the world. This shortcoming is most obvious in the complete lack of a discussion of industrialization - although very few countries can hope to develop without industrialization. It is about misery and dealing with symptoms of backwardness and poverty, not its causes or the process of development. I actually liked it because it is really good at what it covers, but what it covers is seriously flawed. I'm not saying that we should c Rating this book is a dilemma for me.

Terjemahan buku economic development michael p. todaro